speech bubble with power symbol

Micro-Hydro Power

Site Assessment

This is the page opening:

Montana and Wyoming are fortunate to possess the two important pieces of a viable hydropower resource: water and elevation. Although both states often suffer from drought, many of our water resource come from perennial high elevation resources, which creates an opportunity to harvest clean energy from falling water. The scarce nature of developable hydropower resources means that landowners need to understand the two important characteristics of a hydropower resources: head (elevation) and flow (water).

Determining Head

microhydro-2-vertical-dropBasically, head is the vertical distance that water falls. It is important to note that head is not a measure of the horizontal length of a pipeline (penstock). Only the vertical distance influences available energy. (Longer pipelines can actually reduce available energy through friction loss). The greater the head, the more energy available. The figure on the right illustrates the importance of vertical drop. It is also important to understand the difference between gross head and net head. Gross head is the total vertical distance between the intake and turbine. The gross head is reduced over the length of the penstock by friction and turbulence loss. Standard friction loss tables, often used for irrigation calculations, can provide more precise calculations. Friction loss is often 20 percent of gross head.1

Measuring head can be a difficult task for landowners. The services of a professional surveyor or engineer may be required. A U.S. Geologic Survey topographic map can be used to approximate the available head, as can an altimeter or GPS unit. These will provide rough estimates of available head. Several more precise methods can also be used by the more intrepid landowner seeking to estimate head, including attaching a graduated pressure gauge to a temporary hose or using a surveyors transit or laser level to estimate head. These methods are described in detail in Micro-Hydro Power: A Beginners Guide to Design and Installation from the National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service.

Determining Flow

The other vital component of available energy is the amount of water that is available to be diverted to the penstock. It is important to remember that stream water flows, especially in Montana and Wyoming, are highly regulated and can be quite seasonal. More water is often available in spring and early summer during snowmelt than in late summer. This variation can impact your expected energy production, and it is important to remember that an average flow with great seasonal variation may not be the most accurate measure on which to base the sizing of a micro-hydro system.

Some landowners already know how much water is in an existing canal or pipeline is available to them based upon documents provided as part of a water right. Simple methods can be used to estimate the amount of water available for a micro-hydro system. For example, contact your local irrigation district, water supply, or USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service office to see if they have the flows for the waterway. If these are unavailable, several do-it-yourself methods are possible, including the bucket-and-weir and float methods. The bucket measure is simply diverting the waterway into a bucket of known volume and timing how long it takes to fill. The weir method involves a temporary structure that diverts the water through an opening of known size and depth. A float is then used to measure the velocity of the water that flows through the opening. Once again, the Micro-Hydro Power: A Beginners Guide to Design and Installation from the National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service is an excellent resource for a detailed description of these methods.

Calculating Available Energy

Once the head and flow are known, the power available for a micro-hydropower system can be calculated. There are some losses converting the kinetic energy of flowing water into electricity because the efficiency of micro-hydropower turbines is not 100 percent. Accurate calculations need to consider this loss. For most micro-hydropower systems, a rough estimate of 50 percent efficiency is accurate. Therefore for a 53 percent efficient turbine simply multiply net head (feet) by flow (gallons per minute) divided by 10 (a constant that serves as a correction factor). This will provide output in Watts. As an equation:

(Net head (feet) Å~ Flow (gallons per minute))/10 = Power (Watts)

This equation will give a landowner a good estimate of the amount of power that can be extracted from a hydropower resource.2

Characteristics of a Viable Location

Although any places with flowing water and adequate head can be a viable location for a micro-hydropower system, the following characteristics help to identify some of the “better” locations:

“Hydro Prospecting”

In addition to simply knowing the characteristics of waterways and canals on your property, other methods exist that help you identify potential locations for hydroelectric facilities. One of the best is Idaho National Laboratory’s Virtual Hydro Prospector. This web-based geographic information system (GIS) resource will let you examine micro-hydropower potential on all naturally flowing waterways across Montana and Wyoming. Please visit http://hydropower.inel.gov/prospector/index.shtml to access the tool. You can also contact either Montana or Wyoming Cooperative Extension Service for help using the tool.

References

Davis, Scott. Microhydro: Clean Power from Water. New Society Publishing. Canada: 2003.

Idaho National Laboratory. Hydropower Program. Available at http://hydropower.inel.gov.

Kindberg, Leif. Micro-Hydro Power: A Beginners Guide to Design and Installation. National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service. February 2011. Available at http://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/farm_energy/hydropower.html.

Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service – University of West Virginia Cooperative Extension Service. Small Hydroelectric Plants. EPP-13.ON: FS 13: 1978. Available at http://www.wvu.edu/~exten/infores/pubs/ageng/epp13.pdf.

United States Department of Energy: Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy. Small Hydropower Systems. DOE/GO-102001-1173: July 2001.

 
1 A friction loss table is provided in the referenced Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service – University of West Virginia Cooperative Extension Service publication.
2 If you want more detailed calculations, with known efficiencies, the following equation can be used:
Where: Q = water flow, cubic feet per second
H = Net head, feet
E = efficiency of the micro-hydroelectric plant, percent divided by 100